|
||||||
|
The Peanut Problem
Let's use a different analogy. Some people are allergic to peanuts, others are not. Some mildly, some so severely they may suffocate without immediate medical intervention. Peanuts are problematic enough they are no longer served as a snack on airlines (they are an air born allergen). So, if peanuts have the ability to kill people, why are they not declared unsafe? Simply put, they are toxic only to people who react to them. By and large, peanuts are safe. We are not uniformly allergic to peanuts. By the same token, humans are not uniformly reactive to chemicals. As stated earlier, people often mistake chemical exposure for allergic reactions. Think of a dog running across a yard that has been treated with a synthetic chemical pesticide to control grubs. The first few steps he takes do not pose immediate threat. The next few steps begin accumulating pesticide on his pads. The farther he runs across the yard, the more pesticide he absorbs. Eventually his small body can't resist any more exposure and he reacts, often in the form of a seizure or uncontrolled muscle spasms. No one exposure to the pesticide caused the seizure. And no two dogs can take the same exposure before reacting. The same is true of children and adults. Another rationale for chemical use is that the benefits outweigh the risks. In the case of peanuts, that's true. They are a viable food source. In the case of lawn care, that's not true. Not when an attractive, healthy green lawn can be attained using safe, natural products and by applying some basic maintenance techniques. |
|||||
![]() |
||||||